#Micro four thirds vs frame full

This effectively turns my 70-200 into a 140-400mm lens.

Because of the smaller sensor size, you get a factor 2 crop compared to full-frame sensors.

You can even get an affordable adapter like the K&F one mentioned in the video, which means you can now use the majority of your other glass as well. So you can find a ton of lenses that fit on your camera.

The lens mount is an open standard, which means you can mix and match lenses, I can use Olympus lenses without a problem, kind of like the L-mount alliance.

Most modern-day M43 cameras come packed with features, the GH6 has ProRes recording, synchro scan filming and so much more.

There are exceptions, but generally, they are cheaper.

They are relatively more affordable compared to most full-frame cameras.

As someone with two bulging disks, do not take this matter lightly!

Most M43 cameras are relatively small and lightweight, which means you won’t end up with a painful back as easily.

The positives of Micro Four Thirds for timelapse photographers Let’s review the pros and cons lists, then talk about M43 for timelapse photographers.

#Micro four thirds vs frame full

I’ve come to really love this camera, which is not something I ever expected considering I’m so used to full frame, and I’m using it more and more, which is what prompted the article you are reading right now.

I have recently started using the GH6 more and more because it is a really powerful little camera. Some more context: As you may know, I own a bunch of cameras, I still have my Canon 6DMkII and 1DXMkII DSLRs, I have a Lumix S1 and S5 which I use often, I have a few bridge cameras like the Lumix FZ82 and Nikon P1000 and since earlier this year I also have my first Micro Four Thirds camera, the Lumix GH6, which is what the above video was filmed on.